(2.4GHz is still useful for older devices, and many Wi-Fi smart home devices use 2.4GHz exclusively.) Devices that need lots of bandwidth, like computers, phones and streaming boxes, should use 5GHz whenever possible. The RT-AX86U’s performance on the 2.4GHz network was occasionally slow, but that band can be cluttered with interference from neighboring Wi-Fi networks. It gave the lowest game latency, the fastest file transfer time, the highest average download and upload speed on the wireless benchmark and the best speeds and lowest lag on our Cloudflare internet tests. When we moved the routers to a two-story townhouse and slammed them with a workload that mimics the needs of a bandwidth-hungry home - a 4K Ultra HD Netflix stream, a 4K HDR Apple TV+ stream, a 16.6GB wireless file transfer, a bandwidth test between two WiFi 6 smartphones and a World of Warcraft session all at the same time - the RT-AX86U won without question. And it was 11% faster than the TP-Link Archer AX6000 at close range. In our long-range testing at a 2,000-square-foot house, the RT-AX86U beat the combined average of its competition by 47%–138% on the 5GHz band. Other notable features: OpenVPN server, guest networks, scheduling.Ethernet ports: 1GbE WAN, 2.5GbE WAN or LAN, 4 GbE LAN.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |